<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Helical CT Protocols and Pitch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.veterinaryradiology.net/18/helical-ct-protocols-and-pitch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.veterinaryradiology.net/18/helical-ct-protocols-and-pitch/</link>
	<description>Teaching and learning about veterinary diagnostic imaging.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:19:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mariopingryhospital</title>
		<link>http://www.veterinaryradiology.net/18/helical-ct-protocols-and-pitch/comment-page-1/#comment-1307</link>
		<dc:creator>mariopingryhospital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veterinaryradiology.net/?p=18#comment-1307</guid>
		<description>this is music for my ears, Pete. With my 4-slice MDCT I work almost only in MPR, constantly turning on and off the MIP, 3D rendering, etc. .. For this reason, the slice thickness is everything to me especially if I have to do with cats or toy breeds. I do everything now at 1.2 mm and 0.8 P, of course when I can focus on individual districts and i use 3 mm thickness only for total body examinations of large breeds. Yesterday I scan the abdomen of a chihuahua of 1.5 KG and few cm in lenght for suspected shunt: 0.5 mm slices thikness with P 0.8: Superior visualization of normal and abnormal (he had a small splenophrenic shunt) abdominal vasculature ... almost an art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is music for my ears, Pete. With my 4-slice MDCT I work almost only in MPR, constantly turning on and off the MIP, 3D rendering, etc. .. For this reason, the slice thickness is everything to me especially if I have to do with cats or toy breeds. I do everything now at 1.2 mm and 0.8 P, of course when I can focus on individual districts and i use 3 mm thickness only for total body examinations of large breeds. Yesterday I scan the abdomen of a chihuahua of 1.5 KG and few cm in lenght for suspected shunt: 0.5 mm slices thikness with P 0.8: Superior visualization of normal and abnormal (he had a small splenophrenic shunt) abdominal vasculature &#8230; almost an art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Burger</title>
		<link>http://www.veterinaryradiology.net/18/helical-ct-protocols-and-pitch/comment-page-1/#comment-447</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Burger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veterinaryradiology.net/?p=18#comment-447</guid>
		<description>Interesting blog. I just wanted to add that if you are planning to do any 3D reconstruction or Multi-planar reconstruction to the images the rule of thumb is the thinner the slices the prettier the pictures. I think a lot of Vets overlook the idea of what 3D or MPR can add to their images to help diagnose the issues and illnesses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting blog. I just wanted to add that if you are planning to do any 3D reconstruction or Multi-planar reconstruction to the images the rule of thumb is the thinner the slices the prettier the pictures. I think a lot of Vets overlook the idea of what 3D or MPR can add to their images to help diagnose the issues and illnesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

